Performance Review

Annual review structure: results, behaviours, growth areas, peer feedback, manager assessment.

# Performance Review â [Reviewer â Reviewee] **Period covered:** [Start] â [End] **Reviewer:** [Name + role] **Reviewee:** [Name + role] **Review type:** [Annual | Mid-year | Probation-close] **Final score:** [Holistic rating â to be filled at end] ## 1. Results What did the reviewee actually deliver this period? Anchor to OKRs, projects, and customer-visible outcomes â not activity logs. - Key delivery 1: [outcome + impact] - Key delivery 2: [outcome + impact] - Key delivery 3: [outcome + impact] ## 2. Behaviours / how Did the reviewee deliver in ways the team would want to replicate? Address each value: - **[Value 1]:** [observed behaviour] - **[Value 2]:** [observed behaviour] - **[Value 3]:** [observed behaviour] ## 3. Peer feedback synthesis Drawn from [N] anonymous peer-feedback responses. Themes only â never quote in a way that identifies the source. - Recurring strengths: [...] - Recurring growth areas: [...] - Surprising signal: [...] ## 4. Self-assessment summary From the reviewee's self-review: - What they're most proud of: [...] - Where they think they fell short: [...] - What they want next: [...] ## 5. Growth areas (next 6 months) Specific, behavioural, and measurable. "Get better at communication" is not actionable; "lead the weekly architecture sync and produce written summaries within 24 hours" is. 1. [Growth area + specific commitment + measure of progress] 2. [Growth area + specific commitment + measure of progress] 3. [Growth area + specific commitment + measure of progress] ## 6. Career conversation - Reviewee's stated 12-24 month aspiration: [...] - What this role offers toward that: [...] - What gaps remain: [...] - Manager commitment: [...] ## 7. Compensation - Current band: [...] - Recommended change: [salary / equity / bonus] - Rationale: [...] - Approved by: [comp committee / VP / CEO] ## 8. Final rating Per the rating scale: - 1 = Significantly below expectations - 2 = Below - 3 = Meets - 4 = Above - 5 = Significantly above Rating: [N] Rationale: [2-3 sentences justifying] ## 9. Manager and reviewee sign-off - Manager: [name] â [date] - Reviewee acknowledges receipt: [date] - (Acknowledgement is not agreement; reviewee may file written disagreement separately.)

Price: Free
State: approved